The Four Horseman Have Been Released

and then some....

my husband came in this morning and mentioned Beyonce singing at the inauguration yesterday. Why am I not surprised, seriously, it makes perfect sense.

Beyonce's Clothes Line for Little Girls [see link: http://showbizblog.ctv.ca/blog/_archives/2008/5/9/3682997.html



Now, Islam's Idea of Little Girls [see link, one of numerous: http://www.france24.com/en/20081126-indonesian-clerics-take-child-brides-back-anti-porn-bill and while not ALL Muslims support child marriage/pedophilia [many strongly object, I want to be Very clear on that], unfortunately, the Koran supports child marriage, here is why: http://muslim-quotes.netfirms.com/childbrides.html

Remember something, by that logic, 'her Silence is her permission, so, taking that logic, a three year old's silence is permission, a six year old's, a ten year old's....as IF, they understand the consequences or have prior knowledge at That young of an age. The entire issue is about Control and Rape, control in that no young girl is going to fight/object, she is Powerless. Why pedophiles prey on children. More on this later



See the Difference? That's because there Isn't one,

both sexualizing little girls, either making them Child Brides or Child Prostitutes,

so, surprised that Beyonce sang at Obama's Inauguration,

Hardly.

Lets look at who of course, as at the DNC, prayed as well at the Facade Mock Show of Democracy, and the Muslim Liason, Ms. Nawas, that Obama chose who is a dire hard staunch supporter of Sharia Law and stonings and child marriages [see article below], Ingrid Mattson,

a woman nethertheless that is a Promoter and Supporter of SHARIA LAW. Honor killings and stonings of girls who have been raped, completely ACCEPTABLE TO HER,

and Thats what they are going to set up here in America...all with the help of

WESTERN FEMINISTS WHO HAVE BEEN COLONIZED AND STUPIFIED. IF you think for one moment that the MS feminists or the Naomi Wolf's of the world will step up to fight for girls in America who are stoned or forced into Burka or forced into marriages,

you are Highly mistaken, hardly. No, what they'll do is talk on t.v. media and shake their hair and laugh and talk of how progressive they are, wink wink,

or they like the Queen of Jordan will bask in diamonds and furs while the blood of the poor will swim around their feet.

America you've been so duped, you are SHEEP TO THE SLAUGHTER, seriously,

for those who are awake, Dig in, Keep your eyes on God, for those of you who may not be spiritual, you might want to reconsider, if that isn't option,

at least, use common sense, watch What is done, rather than what is Said.

And, what is NOT said, by so called progressive groups, often says more, than what is being said. SILENCE IS CONSENT,

either by not knowing/ignorance or innocence,

or flat out deception [when it comes to adults being silent in the face of evil].

Last but not least, I think this site says it better than me, so I'm posting it here,
[its on Women in Islam, I'm reposting it here as its far too important to NOT]

Lecturing Europe While Accepting the Social Structure of Brutality
Seldom do I publish opinion pieces. However, given the coronation of king Obama today (do you sense my sarcasm here?) I figured this would be worth a read. Exactly how DOES Obama feel about women living under Shari'ah?

Frank Salvato, Managing Editor
The New Media Journal


New York Times columnist David Brooks recently wrote, “The reason we have a democracy is that no one side is right all the time. The only people who are dangerous are those who can’t admit, even to themselves, that obvious fact.” Aside from the glaring error in his declaration that we live in a democracy (the United States is actually a Democratic Republic, not a democracy) his assertion is spot on. In light of the logic in Mr. Brook’s statement, it would seem that the woman slated to be Barack Obama’s “Muslim liaison” is dangerous, especially to women.

While Barack Obama was lecturing tens of thousands of Germans during his “fact-finding tour” – interesting that he declared he was going to the Middle East and Europe to “listen” and ends up pontificating – his campaign created the position of “Muslim Liaison;” a position meant to serve as a conduit between his campaign and the Muslim community. Presumably, this position was created because his campaign realized that their Islamophobia (he has yet to address a Muslim forum or talk at a Mosque) was incredibly hypocritical and served to disenfranchise and discriminate against the American-Muslim community.

The likely candidate for this position is Hiam Nawas, a Jordanian-American who served in a similar capacity for the ill-fated 2004 presidential campaign of aspiring politician Wesley Clark (interestingly, for someone who served in a recent presidential campaign the Internet is stunningly devoid of any substantial biographical information on Ms. Nawas).

One of the things we do know about Ms. Nawas is that she has a fairly nonchalant and cavalier attitude regarding the plight of women in the Islamic culture.

In 2005, Nawas wrote that the Bush Administration should “nuance” its approach toward addressing the cruelty and barbarity women face in the Islamic culture:

"We need to recognize that the social structure in the Muslim world is very different from America's...American women need to understand that what is best for them is not necessarily what is best for Muslim women. Advocacy of women’s rights in the Muslim world must show sensitivity to local political realities."

Anyone who has spent even the smallest amount of time researching the plight of women in Islamic society should be stunned, not only by the depth of Nawas’ appeasement to the totalitarian and despotic attitudes toward women in Islamic society, but for the fact that a presidential candidate would be so callow as to find someone – let alone a woman – possessing Nawas’ attitude acceptable to serve as a liaison to any plurality.

As I outlined in a prior article, Women in Islam: Suffering the Barbary of an Ideology, the treatment of women in Islamic society can only be defined as barbaric. While there are some locations throughout the Muslim World that are making strides toward rectifying this situation – Saudi Arabia is allowing women to drive now – this is overwhelmingly the exception rather than the rule.

It is a verifiable and undeniable fact that women in the fundamentalist Islamic world are relegated to the status of possessions. Women are routinely sold into arranged marriages by their fathers who receive a dowry for the “sale”; the dowry sometimes issued in the form of goats or other forms of livestock. The practice of polygamy is widespread throughout the Middle East. In countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Pakistan, to name but a few, women are subjected to despotic cultural edicts where “offenses,” ranging from un-Islamic dress to being “in the presence” of an unrelated male, are punished – justified under Sharia Law – by whippings, beatings, stoning and death sentences. Honor killings occur frequently and Islamic society accepts it with no form of recourse, no justice for the victim.

And while Ms. Nawas is readying herself to espouse her indifference to the plight of Muslim women in the name of Barack Obama’s candidacy, she does so intimating that the problem of Islamic cultural inequity toward women is a malady removed from American soil. This notion is a falsehood of the highest order. Honor killings are taking place right here on American soil.

Sarah and Amina Said, 17 and 18 respectively, were murdered by their father Yaser Said in Dallas, Texas, in February of 2008 because he felt Western culture was corrupting the chastity of his daughters. He is currently at large. Law enforcement believes he is being harbored by the Islamic community in North Texas.

In Atlanta, Georgia, Chaudhry Rashad, admitted to strangling his 25-year old daughter, Sandela, saying he killed his daughter as a matter of honor, because he felt her plans for divorce would have disgraced the family.

In Henrietta, New York, Waheed Allah Mohammad stabbed his 19-year old sister, Fauzia, to death because she was going to clubs, wearing immodest clothing and planning to leave her family for a new life in New York City.

A superficial search of the term “honor killing” on the Internet results in 2,440,000 entries, so it is impossible to say that the issue is outside the mainstream.

While the instances of honor killings here in the United States are being prosecuted the fact remains that women are considered and treated as possessions in the Islamic culture, whether here in the US or abroad, to the extent of being murdered. Meanwhile, Ms. Nawas says we need to “show sensitivity to local political realities.” Muslim women are dying, both overseas and on American soil, and Ms. Nawas believes we should “nuance our approach” so as not to offend those maintaining the despotic culture.

As Barack Obama finished his “fact-finding tour” speech (really, who goes on a fact-finding trip and has the audacity to stage a speech for tens of thousands) he proclaimed:

"This is the moment we must help answer the call for a new dawn in the Middle East."

It would seem that Barack Obama’s idea of a “new dawn” for women trapped in the Islamic culture – in light of his pick for liaison to the Muslim community – is one that includes a “nuanced approach” to the brutality the Islamic culture inflicts on women each and every day. I’m sure tossing them that bone will win him votes...cast right before they find themselves in pools of their own blood for having had the audacity to vote; for having had the “audacity of hope.”

Frank Salvato is the Executive Director and Director of Terrorism Research for BasicsProject.org a non-profit, non-partisan, 501(c)(3) research and education initiative. His writing has been recognized by the US House International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention. His organization, BasicsProject.org, partnered in producing the original national symposium series addressing the root causes of radical Islamist terrorism. He also serves as the managing editor for The New Media Journal. Mr. Salvato has appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News Channel and is a regular guest on talk radio including on The Right Balance with Greg Allen on the Accent Radio Network and on The Captain's America Radio Show catering to the US Armed Forces around the world. His opinion-editorials have been published by The American Enterprise Institute, The Washington Times & Human Events and are syndicated nationally. He is occasionally quoted in The Federalist. Mr. Salvato is available for public speaking engagements.

NOTE: also, his choices of so called Christians, one extreme anti-Gay [remember, one thing fundies have in common, hate of gays and hate of women, like, duh, surprise surprise, and These types of Christian fundies are the ones saying hang gays in the streets,

lets not forget that. Only thing missing folks, is one of the men from those LDS compounds that force little girls into marriage with of course the representation by the ACLU of all things,

Obama should have really gone for it eh, chose some of those pedophile bastards too, why the hell not?

He's appeased and chosen every other Whack job out there to promote some twisted sick kind of Universalism,

IF IT WASN'T SO SERIOUS IT WOULD BE COMICAL AS HELL,

on one hand you have a woman singer, typical of what comes out in the sex driven raunch culture media, who sings half ass naked and promotes clothes for girls as young as six that makes them look like little Fredericks of Hollywood catalog or child prostitutes lined up in Brothels in Thailand or Holland,

you have one woman praying from the Islamic community that has Openly stated on occasion that she supports a world wide Caliphate and Sharia Law, etc etc etc

another woman chosen who has the gall to say that what is acceptable in regards to human rights for American /Western women is not acceptable to Muslim women, why they are different you know, Sub human, according to the logic of promoting Sharia and forcing silence of any condemnation of the barbarity and horrid treatment/AND SLAVERY these women/girls are forced into,

you have a gay bashing hating preacher and a woman preacher, I suppose to show some kind of balance,

I mean, Good Grief. It reminds me of that one song by M&M, the one about the circus, AND TO TOP IT OFF,

PETA, GIVING OR LOANING FURS MARKED WITH PAINT TO THE HOMELESS IN THE AREA,

ROFL,

I mean, come on people,

are we as a nation That drunk in stupidity and lack of the ability to see beyond our sensual organs that we can't see what in the hell is going on here?

Yea yea all is well and change is gonna happen and we'll all sing peace and kumbayah and the haters will have a change of heart and why,

you can have those who are against abuse of women and gays right next to those who want to cut their sexual organs off and marry them off and are accepting of killing young girls who can't produce four witnesses to their rapes all sitting at the same table,

and even more so,

anti-capitalists who are so pissed at Bush's regime/prior regime and who want the end to capitalist wage slavery yet,

LOL, here's the clincher folks, sitting at the same table with the very religion that has over 100 texts in their book THAT SANCTIONS, CONDONES AND ORDERS

SLAVERY OF INFIDELS.

Do these idiots ever take the blinders off, do they not know about the revolts by the poorest of the poor and these Muslim countries that if NOT developing and in bed with the worst capitalists in the world who have these sweat shops and labor camps,

but the other Muslim countries who ship/traffick the poor from their countries TO THESE DEVELOPED COUNTRIES, to be slaves...

and THEY ARE GOING TO END CAPITALIST SLAVERY?

Come on people, you Can't be that stupid, really,

or can you?

Natasha